If you are staying in Pattaya you may have already noticed it, otherwise you will definitely have to deal with it in the future. On Sukhumvit Road in Pattaya, the first works have started leading to a traffic tunnel that should relieve the busy traffic on that road.

It will be a four-lane tunnel stretching 1900 meters from Pornprapanimit Road to Nakorn Chai Air Transportation Center (roughly speaking, from Siam Country Road to the King Power building).

Surprising

For me it was a surprise. Of course I know that Sukhumvit in Pattaya is a terribly busy and therefore traffic-hazardous road that should be addressed at some point. I did not know that a tunnel was an option, but I immediately admit that I have not closely followed the local news about it. Yes, occasionally the possibility was discussed, but it remained with postponement and further studies. You soon lose interest that way.

I once looked back in the press and was able to determine that plans had already been in existence for about ten years. Many meetings of authorities were arranged and “hearings” were also held where the public sector could raise objections or come up with new ideas. But I soon got the idea that the decision for the tunnel had already been made and that all kinds of objections and alternatives were sympathetically heard before disappearing into the trash. A newspaper article stated that the tunnel plan was voted “democratically”.

It was not made clear who the voters were and what they could vote for. To be honest, I got an unkind thought that maybe personal and/or company interests have prevailed.

Opening ceremony

On October 17, 2014, the time had come. A festive, yet official ceremony was held at Pattaya City Hall to mark the start of the project. The deputy mayor chaired the meeting, which was attended by all kinds of leaders from the municipality, province, state, police and executive contractors. “The purpose of the tunnel is to reduce the ever-increasing traffic congestion on Sukhumvit Pattaya,” said the deputy mayor. Good plan, isn't it? He further stated that the budget for this project was 837.441.000 Baht and that the project was expected to be completed in 810 working days. The first shovel would go into the ground on November 15, 2014.

Issues

Judging by these figures, you could say that a lot of preparation has been done, but the first problem soon arose. An alert official had noticed that November 15 might not have been such a good idea because of the imminent traffic congestion for the holidays. Kudos to him, the initial work was postponed to mid-February 2015.

That's where we are now. We have only been on the road for a few weeks and the problems, objections and protests are almost escalating. I will mention a few, but mind you, this is just the beginning.

Traffic on Sukhumvit Road

At the location of the tunnel, Sukhumvit Road has been reduced from four lanes in each direction to three lanes. The intersection with Pattaya Klang is closed as well as the intersection with Siam Country Road. Side roads to and from East Pattaya only have one-way traffic. The narrowing of the road and the closure of certain roads have already resulted in quite a few accidents, fortunately none fatal as far as I know. Traffic is warned, apparently not in time, or at least the road users react badly to it.

Shortcuts

You can already see that the consequences of the work have not been sufficiently thought through. One-way traffic, closures and diversions of the major roads mean that many other streets, including the narrower ones, are now used as shortcuts. Soi Arunothai and 3rd Road, for example, already had heavy traffic, now it regularly jams. The signage for the detours is often there, but is hardly visible to motorists or at least only at the last moment. I myself have seen a few times that people ignore directions, turn left where that is not allowed and is not possible and then the steering wheel is suddenly turned to choose a different direction.

Middle class

Shops in the streets of East Pattaya up to the railway will have fewer customers due to the reduced traffic, which soon became noticeable. The shops in Pattaya Klang will also be hit, as they are difficult to reach for residents of the "dark side". A regular visitor reported on an English-language forum that it has now become very quiet in Foodland. Big C Extra will also notice it, but it has the advantage that customers have an alternative with Big C Pattaya South. Another reader noted that the traffic chaos of the next few years would be a good opportunity for a large supermarket chain to think about opening a branch in East Pattaya.

Why a tunnel?

The decision was thus made to build a road tunnel, which was criticized from the start. It would be much better if there were a long flyover. An important point in the objections is the possible flooding in the tunnel. It is precisely on this stretch of Sukhumvit that the road is regularly flooded during the rainy season. However, a (senior) official of the municipality has stated that sufficient measures have been taken in the design of the tunnel and that a flood is "impossible". A cynic wondered whether the civil servant would still be employed if a flood did occur in the tunnel in a few years' time. I read somewhere that there is also a U-turn in the tunnel, but that seems to me, especially for Thailand, asking for trouble.

Alternatives

Were there no alternatives, apart from the fly-over, available? Well, sure. I'm obviously not a traffic expert, but I do start with my own idea. Coming from East Pattaya I sometimes take the road parallel to the railway line to avoid Sukhumvit. That is a two-lane road on both sides of the railway line that has already become quite familiar to road users. Expand that road, because the intersections with the various level crossings must be improved and, moreover, there must be a good connection on the south side with Sukhumvit.

Someone suggested that a tunnel on Sukhumvit would not be necessary at all if tunnels were added from Pattaya Klang and Pattaya South under Sukhumvit Road to East Pattaya. Good idea, but the problem there is that a straight tunnel to East Pattaya is not possible from both streets because of the housing on the other side.

Pattaya Progress Association

In the period when the tunnel plan was still a plan and was being thought about a lot, a group of people – presumably all foreigners – emerged who called themselves the Pattaya Progress Association. That group contributed ideas to tackle the problem of Sukhumvit Road in Pattaya and came up with a detailed report. Several variants were explained in a presentation in October 2009 during an Expats Club meeting. I have read the description of the alternatives, the PPA Bypass and the Maprachan Highway and the accompanying sketches also make a lot clear. I am not going to explain that further here because it is of little use after the tunnel decision. If you are interested check out this link: www.pattayaprogress.org/roads/tunnels-under-sukhumvit

I have tried to contact this PPA but have been unsuccessful. I have the impression that the club has fallen apart after the disappointment about the tunnel decision.

Finally

At the beginning of this story, I quoted the deputy mayor as saying that the purpose of the road tunnel was to ease traffic on Sukhumvit. To achieve that goal, however, Pattaya will have to count on an increase in traffic problems for a number of years. Good for tourism? I do not think so!

You should remember the mentioned budget of over 837 million Baht, that will be much higher, I assure you. The time frame of 810 days (= 27 months) will also be amply exceeded. Just count on a year or six.

My conclusion is that it is a disastrous decision in many ways. It will not do the tourists and the population of the city of Pattaya (except for a few!) any good. And whether it will indeed solve the traffic problems of Pattaya and the surrounding area after all these years is highly questionable.

14 Responses to “Tunnel Construction Sukhumvit Pattaya Has Started”

  1. Louis49 says up

    A lot will stick to the fingers. And that is not the main goal, the first rainy period that thing is guaranteed to be completely under water

  2. piet says up

    I wouldn't be surprised if the plan is still called off, but TIT
    Coming holidays it will be a nice traffic chaos 🙁

  3. Pieter says up

    I had heard the bell ring about the tunnel, but investing an amount of 20 million euros to be faster in traffic jams in the Central or South Road is throwing money away.
    Expanding the bypass along the track would have been a lot better and I think better use for the money would have been possible. For example, sidewalks or parking options, because that's the problem when these cars are in Pattaya.
    A traffic expert has not yet been invented in Thailand. What kind of crazy plan comes next??

    The pedestrian crossings oabeach-Second and Third Road are not or hardly used and if you cross them your life is not safe and if you were to stop for “Red” there is a good chance that someone will hit you from behind. These crossings cost only 6 million euros.
    Plan is good but it doesn't work in Thailand.

  4. lexphuket says up

    Underpasses are also being built in Phuket: 1 is almost (?) ready, albeit more than a year late, the third is just starting. The second now causes chaos and extra traffic jams, the first still does and the third will contribute quite a bit. And we have already had flooding in the first tunnel: that was foreseeable and will also happen in Pattaya.
    I wish the poor people of Pattaya strength, but one advantage: many of us will not see the end of this "improvement"

  5. Cross Gino says up

    Dear,
    However, I only went to school until I was 18 years old, but aren't those construction engineers and traffic experts really smarter now.
    First of all, you cannot make exits in a tunnel.
    As the traffic here is very reckless, what in case of a major accident?
    What about heavy rain?
    Best would have been concrete pillars in the central reservation and a bridge on top like in Bangkok.
    The previous points were no problem and I think performed faster and much cheaper.
    But who am I?
    A dead simple farang.
    Greetings, Gino.

    • john says up

      Certainly never been to Brussels. There are several exits in the tunnels!

      • BA says up

        Beats. In many cities in Scandinavia, for example, you also have underground tunnels and highways because those cities are largely built on rock formations with a lot of height difference, etc. There you also have tunnels where roads simply converge and where you have exits, etc.

        A different kind of construction. Those tunnels are drilled/blown with explosives through the hard rocks. They have to dig that tunnel in Pattaya and then it will be a slightly different story.

        Incidentally, I am not familiar with the tunnel plan, but it seems to me that the intention is that people who need to take an exit at Sukhumvit simply take Sukhumvit, and that through traffic simply takes the tunnel.

        Here in Khon Kaen they have a smaller tunnel, but the same goal. Through traffic going towards Udon Thani takes the tunnel and traffic that has to have an exit goes above ground. Find a neat solution and it is actually faster. With Fly overs you can achieve the same thing but it is a lot messier above ground.

        • ruud says up

          And probably too cheap.
          You don't have to leave it for the view in most cities.
          All those filthy black concrete buildings along the side of the road.

  6. Cor van Kampen says up

    That part of the road where the tunnel will be is always under water when it rains.
    They've been messing around there for years and they're still not done. Still working on it.
    If above ground can't keep it dry, what about a tunnel?
    Can always become a new water park. Under the motto diving into the underworld of Pattaya.
    We as foreigners will have to pay more entrance, but that should not spoil the fun.
    Cor van Kampen.

    • BA says up

      Discharge into the tunnel and pump out. There is a fixed budget for this for 20 million euros 🙂

      That is even easier than trying to keep an above-ground road dry because all the water runs to 1 point.

  7. Hendrik van Geet says up

    They had the same problem in Khong Kaen and it works there, yes years of renovations and diversions but the result is there and it works. Give them some time ok ;-))

  8. Franky R . says up

    Thai love trouble… That's my take on this superfluous tunnel. A fly-over would have been much better and also easy to realize.

    I think I'm going to apply in Thailand as a traffic expert?

    Have gained sufficient experience in the Netherlands and Belgium.

  9. theos says up

    This stretch of road has been flooded every rainy season for as long as I can remember and that's been for the past 40 years! I drove through it once with my pickup, chasing a songtaew, and then the water was up to the windshield. A Toyota Hi Lux of which you switched the air intake upwards by pulling a lever. This tunnel is guaranteed to be completely flooded. As said a fly-over would have been better, but yes, TIT!

  10. Colin Young says up

    Been to 2 council meetings with an interpreter and indicated that this is the stupidest thing they can do. A flyover is much cheaper and faster and prevents a dozen problems that do exist today. But after farangs there is certainly no listening. This will be a big mess that will cost a fortune including all the problems for many for the next 5 years. Everything takes much, much longer and you will see that the contractor also stops, such as with the construction of Jomtien Second road and Thrappaya road, which also took 3 times as long.


Leave a comment

Thailandblog.nl uses cookies

Our website works best thanks to cookies. This way we can remember your settings, make you a personal offer and you help us improve the quality of the website. read more

Yes, I want a good website