The infamous road between Chiang Mai and Mae Hong Son, blessed with hundreds of hairpin bends, is the only reminder of a long-forgotten piece of Thai war history. Just a few hours after the Japanese Imperial Army invaded Thailand on December 8, 1941, the Thai government – despite fierce fighting back in places – decided to lay down its arms, believing that further resistance to the numerically stronger and better armed Japanese would be suicide. From that moment on, Britain and the United States regarded Thailand as an enemy-occupied country and a victim of Japanese aggression.
However, Field Marshal Phibun Songkhram, the not entirely uncontroversial Thai government leader at the time, believed that opportunities now presented themselves to settle a number of old scores. Not averse to some opportunism, he had already taken advantage of the German invasion of France in 1940 and the subsequent French capitulation to militarily to re-annex large tracts of territory east of the Mekong, which Siam had unwillingly handed over to the French at the end of the nineteenth century.
Behind the backs of the Allies and most members of his cabinet, Phibun sought rapprochement with Japan. As early as December 14, 1941, he signed a secret treaty in which he undertook to provide military assistance to a Japanese invasion of Burma, which was then in British hands. A week later, the Thai-Japanese alliance was already official when Phibun signed a military cooperation agreement at Wat Phra Kaeo in Bangkok. In exchange, Japan promised that Thailand would get back the Malay provinces that had been handed over to the British in 1909 and, as icing on the cake, also the 'lost regions' in Burma, especially the Shan state. This last guarantee was certainly debatable because Thailand, apart from two invasions in 1803-1804 and 1852-1854, had no leg to stand on to justify this claim on historical grounds. A few weeks later, Phibun went one step further by declaring war on Britain and the United States on January 25, 1942. A declaration of war that was not well received by all Thais, and certainly not by the least. Among others, former ministers Pridi Banomyong and Direk Jayanaman, the Thai ambassador in Tokyo, but also Seni Pramoj, the Thai ambassador in Washington, placed the biggest doubts about this decision. Pramoj flatly refused to hand over the declaration of war to the US government and promptly founded the Free Thai Movement.
Phibun, however, was not impressed and started a new army corps, the Northern Army to invade Burma under the command of Luang Seri Roengrit and take control of the area east of the Salween River, then known as the Eastern Shan State. The Japanese, who had guaranteed the return of Burmese territory in the secret treaty, made no objections in principle, but they strongly opposed Phibun's plans to immediately claim the Karen state as well. Tokyo was perhaps a bit bored with Phibun's drive. After all, the Japanese had meanwhile helped a puppet government in Burma led by the Burmese nationalist Ba Maw to power. The latter, understandably, was not very enthusiastic when he was informed of the Thai annexationist plans. During a meeting of Ba Maw with the Japanese Prime Minister, Major General Hideki Tojo in Singapore, a fierce exchange of words broke out, but the Japanese decided not to blow the whistle on Phibun. However, they tried to keep him on the ground with both feet, because the Thai leader, who was not always devoid of a sense of reality, believed that occupying the Shan state was a 'piece of cake' would become…
In reality, everything went a little less smoothly. First and foremost, there was the logistical problem. The northernmost Thai railway stopped in Chiang Mai. As a result, all transport from Chiang Mai had to take place over the often deplorable roads, sometimes even over dangerous mountain paths. Moreover, the army material made available did not really turn out to be the cream of the crop. Many of the soldiers involved came from Isaan and, in their thin uniforms, were unable to cope with the wintry weather conditions of the northern Thai mountains. Moreover, their motivation turned out to be quite lacking and most of them had no idea of their mission, let alone who they would have to fight… What Phibun had certainly not counted on was the fact that he had to confront combat-experienced Chinese troops .
Almost immediately after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, Chinese Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-shek had offered to the Allies to send his Nationalist Kuomintang troops to northern Burma to destroy the vital supply lines between Rangoon and the then Chinese to help secure the capital Chonqing. Units of the 93 departed from Yunnane Division that arrived in Shan State at the end of January 1942 and installed themselves in Kengtung. On 3 May 1942, 27 Thai planes attacked Kengtung in two waves as a prelude to the arrival of the Northern Army a few weeks later. The Kuomintang retreated to the mountains and jungle around Kengtung and the Thai vanguard under Field Marshal Pin Choonhavan occupied the city without a fight.
An enraptured Phibun praised the bravery and soldierly value of his troops, declared the Shan state "freed from the enemy', renamed the area 'original Thai state' and installed a provisional Thai administration in Kengtung. The rainy season, which erupted in violence shortly afterwards, prevented further military operations, but formed a new test for the Thai troops. A shortage of food and medicine meant that malaria and dengue fever outnumbered the fighting. It was not until January 1943 that Phibun took care of this problem by sending ten tons of quinine to the North. When, a few weeks later, the leader himselforiginal Thai state' visited he was shocked by the state in which he found his troops. He immediately sent orders to Bangkok for uniforms, staff officers, sugar, money, medical personnel and a hundred bullock carts of bananas. With the support of the Japanese, who had closely followed the Thai troops, he had hundreds of kilometers of new roads built to connect Chiang Mai to the Shan state. For example, the road to Mae Hong Son was created.
As the odds of war gradually turned in favor of the Allies, Thai governments slowly began to realize that Phibun might be on the wrong track. Japan, meanwhile, officially recognized in August 1943 by means of a treaty that the Shan State and the Malay provinces of Kelantan, Trengganu, Perlis and Kedah were Thai territory. In the 'original Thai state' it all looked much less rosy. Chased by Kuomintang troops and still battling health problems, life for the soldiers of the Thai Northern Army no fun. Sick or wounded soldiers sent back to Bangkok for treatment were unpleasantly surprised by the manifest lack of enthusiasm for their adventures. Despite Phibun's propaganda stories, no one seemed interested in what had happened to them... Moreover, the Japanese occupation troops, with their well-known arrogance, appeared to be ruthless in keeping the indigenous population under control. Ethnic Chinese were slaughtered, expelled, or used as forced laborers. A sad'Highlight' was the total destruction of the Chinese Hui Muslim community in Panglong in Hopang District. With this heavy-handed policy, the Japanese made it painfully clear to the Thai troops who the real masters of the 'original Thai state' goods…
As the war dragged on, it got Northern Army more and more forgotten. In Bangkok, after the British had launched an offensive in Burma in the spring of 1944, other cats had to be flogged. The Thai capital increasingly became the target of allied bombing, while dissatisfaction with the way the Japanese handled their Thai 'allies' around, increased visibly. After Japanese Prime Minister Tojo resigned on July 18, 1944, it was also amen and out for Phibun, who was seen as Tojo's protégé. Phibun was forced to resign on July 24, 1944 by the Thai Legislative Assembly. His successor Khuang Aphaiwong was considered influential Free Thai Movement pressured to change camp and enter into negotiations with the Allies in the greatest secrecy. After all, it was an open secret that the British, who were more than incensed about Phibun's stab in the back, were out for revenge. It was thanks to heavy diplomatic pressure from the United States – which needed Thailand as a future ally for geopolitical reasons – that Churchill finally refrained from punitive measures against Thailand.
The end of the war also marked the end of theoriginal Thai state'. Almost immediately after Japan's capitulation, it took off Northern Army back to Thailand. However, some soldiers chose to stay in the Shan state and start a new life there. This also applied to a number of Kuomintang soldiers. I wrote about what happened to them afterwards in my article about the 'Forgotten Army' from Mae Salong.
About this blogger
Read the latest articles here
- BackgroundDecember 28 2024Thailand is a noodle paradise
- BackgroundDecember 10 2024Wat Phra That Phanom: Pearl of the Mekong Valley
- BackgroundNovember 29 2024Wat Phra Kaew: The Temple of the Emerald Buddha
- SightsNovember 24 2024The Ling Buai Ia Shrine in Bangkok
The explanation, although correct in its presentation of facts, still paints a picture of the period 1941-1945 that needs to be supplemented. The ideology behind the pan-Thai state, the differences of opinion between the United States and Great Britain, the Bangkok snake's nest that formed the government - add or subtract from the description given here, which emphasizes military history. This is not the place to enter into an extensive discussion about this, I refer the interested reader to the accessible work of the diplomat Judith A. Stowe: Siam becomes Thailand, London 1991, and in particular chapters 9 – 11.
Indeed Alex. Stowe's book is indeed fantastic, I'm reading a borrowed copy from a good friend (but hoping to pick up another copy myself). In this book it becomes clear that Phibun was very insecure and walked along with the (presumed) winners. He considered cooperation with Western countries (UK, France) as well as Japan. He made commitments to them that he thought would be to his advantage. For example, he verbally indicated to Japan that he would give Japan a completely free map and would support them with materials. That was even more obliging than Tokyo expected, and they asked Phibun to record this in black and white, but then mister was nowhere to be found. Phiboen also still tried to keep the west on friendly terms and later indicated that Thailand was 'neutral'. So a lot of twisting. Once Japan invaded Phiboen was off his post, finding him was difficult and once he was found he took ample time to return to Bangkok, by car instead of a waiting plane. Presumably so that if the government decisions turned out negative, he could pass the black piet on to others.
Phiboen didn't follow the 're-annexation' camp too enthusiastically either. He did give speeches about the 'lost' areas, but he didn't really want to go as far as all the areas this camp wanted to claim. Another case of not choosing too much for 1 party. Except himself that is, because his personality cult did increase steadily.
The Japanese were not happy with pro-Western members within the Khana Ratsadon such as Pridi and Direk Chayanaam (ดิเรก ชัยนาม). But they couldn't just dump these prominent and beloved people, Pridi was promoted to regent so that another could become Finance Minister (accommodating to Japan) and Direk could better communicate from Tokyo what was going on in Japan without being in Thailand or elsewhere. could further antagonize the pro Japan camp.
Part of the book is on Google Books.
See
https://books.google.nl/books?id=YTgJ8aRwZkAC&pg=PR7&hl=nl&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q=shan&f=false
“When some of the ailing Northern Army troops arrived in Bangkok, they noted with dismay that no one in the capital seemed to know or care about the suffering they had endured in the Shan States. Meanwhile, he feared the presence of foreign spies after Allied bombings during his visit to the north. The Northen Arrmy continued to announce new successes. Such news was met with suspicion, the Japanese had already announced that the Shan States had been liberated along with the rest of Burma. Phiboen's reputation was further destroyed by Allied radio broadcasts. As a result, he and the Japanese wanted to ban short wave radios, but without success.” – page 240.
Dear Alex,
It was only my intention to highlight this almost forgotten piece of Thai WWII history as briefly as possible. It would indeed go too far for us to also outline the very complex geo-political context in which all this took place. Perhaps material for a few subsequent pieces…
The following reading tips for the interested reader: The slightly apologetic 'Thailand and World War II' by D. Jayanama (Silkworm Books) and the correct but unfortunately very concise piece about this period in the classic 'Thailand's political history' (River Books) by BJ Terwiel.
I also own those books. Terwiel's is well written, although unfortunately it does not go into depth. Direk's book is quite a pill. Have also been able to buy Stoer's book for a nice price. Some books are for sale second-hand for several hundred euros, I cannot and do not want to pay for that.
Stoer = Stowe (autocorrect…)
A thorough and interesting article. Compliment!
An interesting piece of history. Thanks for this story.
Now clear, why so much is lacking in history education in Thailand? Only the glory and alleluia matters are discussed, but the rest….
Good rendering K. Jan.
I have a question. Do you (or anyone else on this blog) have any idea why the Thai government is making the Shan/Thaiyai people who have fled the war violence from Shan State wait so long for legalization and recognition as Thai residents. My partner's family and many others who live in the Fang (tolerated) area have been waiting for this for more than 30 years. So going back to Burma is no longer an option.
They have no right now. Not getting married, not being able to buy land/house, etc, etc.
However, the worst part is that these traumatized people still live in great fear of the government and its c… servants. Quote; “It is possible, but then you first have to sit in a flooded cave”
Thanks in advance for an answer.
According to.
Shans (Thaiyais) have political ambitions – they want a state in Myanmar with a high degree of independence, since independence from Great Britain after World War II. The promise at the time to opt for secession in due course has now become unrealistic.
A small portion of the Shans from Myanmar live in Thailand as migrants or refugees. The slow administrative granting of Thai nationality is a show of force by the Thai authorities with the message: don't let there be too many – there are millions of Shans in Myanmar.
At least this is the common opinion among the Shans in my village
Dear Theo,
Years ago I gave up trying to put myself in the minds of Thai rulers…I'm afraid the answer is quite simple. Like the Karen refugees, the Thai government would rather get rid of the Shan refugees than get rich. Moreover, there are no votes to be gathered, which means that Thai politicians have also been displaying a disconcerting lack of interest in this harrowing dossier for decades….
Hello Theo,
Could the reason be that the Thai government should expose its buttocks and admit actions of an occupied Thailand and more relevant events??
That becomes a string around the neck for Thai historiography and then they finally have to admit that it has not all gone as rosy as people would like to believe.
LOUISE
“Pramoj even flatly refused to hand over the declaration of war to the US government”
According to Stowe, this is not correct. Siam becomes Thailand, Page 260:
“In later years, Seni (Pramoj) used the claim that he refused to hand over Thailand's declaration of war to the US but kept it in a desk drawer. Strictly speaking, this is not true. When he finally received word from Bangkok about the state of war between the two countries - the message had been delayed by broken connections between Bangkok and Washington - Seni passed the message on to the State Department, saying that it was for information only (for the record) and he would ignore the message himself. That was also Roosevelt's response when he advised Congress to ignore Thailand's declaration of war as well as those of Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania. Only if Thai troops took action against America or her allies should Thailand be seen as hostile.”
Dear Rob,,
The recently released minutes of the US State Department and the diary entries of Seni Pramoj do show that, despite diplomatic customs, he refused to hand over a written declaration of war to the Americans. Shortly before noon on December 8, 1941, he had a conversation with US Secretary of State Corell Hull in which he reported the declaration of war and at the same time indicated that he would disregard this declaration. After lengthy consultations with his embassy staff, he returned to Hull in the late afternoon and offered his services.
A very interesting piece of history.
The "land" of Thailand seemed to not exist at the time.
Form an army with people from Isan? That makes you think. A northern army!
Moderator: We take note of your comment about caution.
My compliments for the readability and thanks for the history lesson.
It seems clear to me that this is not highlighted in history lessons in Thai schools.
In Dutch schools we also learn nothing about the black side of, for example, the Dutch occupation of Indonesia.
Do you still read newspapers?
Nowadays people are crawling through the dust about the Ned. India.
By the way, what do you mean by "Dutch occupation of Indonesia"? Wasn't that of Japan an occupation then? We will not talk about the fate of the Remusha among the Japanese and their willing helper Sukarno.
Just like the bersiap period in which tens of thousands of Dutch people were slaughtered.
Honor to the more than five thousand dead Dutch heroes who died there. May also be said.
If we only talk about the Netherlands and omit Japan, then I think that we had no business there and have not been particularly kosher.
Tragically enough for the men who died there in the name of the Queen to keep an occupied country at all costs.
curious; Omit Japan. Because it suits you better? History is not a supermarket where you pick out what suits you.
Judging people in the past with the wisdom of today and then exhibiting yourself as a “better person” I find downright cheating.
Everything is connected, indeed terrible things have happened and colonialism has its dark sides. But it has also brought modern times to Asia with all the benefits that entails.
Recommended; Romusha van Java The last front W.Rinzema-Admiraal edited by Dr. HJvan Elburg Profile Publisher.
Very nice piece about a piece of war history from ancient Siam to present-day Thailand. I have less words to say about the moralistic tone of the article. France, as well as England, the US, JAPAN all have no business in Siam, nor in Vietnam, just as the Netherlands had no business in Indonesia !! Colonization?? I call it theft and plunder, of which I am deeply ashamed. There was no question of reannexation, but rather of territories that France had stolen from Siam, after all, it belonged to Siam, so that in time of war the opportunity is taken to I can well imagine taking back, but yes, the history books are written by the victors. Furthermore, the inhabitants of the areas concerned probably don't care what flag is flying there, as long as the citizens are well taken care of and that is simply the most important thing.